# Measuring a Part Per Million

Today’s scientific equipment and techniques allow the measurement of very small amounts of particles. “Parts per” is the usual way scientists talk about contents, or concentrations, of a chemical in air or water. When scientists measure down to parts per million, billion or trillion, it’s important to have some sense of just how much—or how little—they are talking about.

A part per million may be hard to comprehend or visualize. Want to see how much it is?

It’s a credit card lying in the middle of a football field.

One step, on a 568–mile walk.

Or one minute, in a two-year span.

Taking that further, a part per billion is one thousand times smaller than that credit card on the football field, for example, or one heartbeat in 27 years for an average male (70 heartbeats per minute).

When it comes to substances we take in when we eat, breath, or absorb something through our skin, the comparisons are made relative to body weight. Normally scientists talk in terms of “milligrams (of material ingested) per kilogram (of body weight).” A milligram is one thousandth of a gram (a gram is about 3/100 of an ounce), and a kilogram is one thousand grams (or about 2 pounds). A milligram of a material ingested per kilogram of body weight is the equivalent of 1 part per million.

Want to see what taking in a milligram per kilogram of your body weight amounts to?

It’s the equivalent of 726 people, each weighing 150 pounds, sharing a chocolate bar.

Obviously, none of those people is going to get a very large piece of that chocolate bar. Now if that were an equivalent amount of a deadly poison such as cyanide, it might still cause some harm. That’s why those tests on rodents are done—to reveal how much of a particular substance it would take to cause a negative health effect, at least in rodents. Although  the results of rodent testing may not always be relevant to humans, they are generally used as a basis for establishing safe levels of exposure to a substance.

Where do phthalates come in to this picture? To take a heavily publicized example, some have raised concern about the health effects of exposure to phthalates in nail polish. On average, nail polish may contain 5% of a phthalate called DBP. Even though rodents can experience negative health effects when they are fed very high levels of DBP, they do not exhibit these effects at levels of DBP of 50 milligrams per kilogram (or 50 ppm) of their body weight, per day.  The Cosmetic Ingredient Review estimates that exposure to DBP from applying nail polish to all fingers and toes is 8.5 milligrams per kilogram per day—nearly 6,000 times below the safe exposure level in the rodents.

Exposure to phthalates used to enhance fragrance in perfumes is even lower. How much perfume would a woman have to douse herself with, every day, to reach the same level of 50 milligrams per kilogram per day—an exposure level that has no effect on rodents?